A FURTHER PRIMER
ON TRAVEL PHOTOGRAPHY

More dubious advice on returning home with a few passable photos

by Stan Tamarkin


The best part of being in the photo business is combining travel with photography. While I do not pretend that I am a pro, I do like to give myself assignments in travel photography, so I can improve on my travel work and, secondly, produce articles for my newsletters from the viewpoint of an avid, but average, amateur who likes the gadget side of photography. My assignment this year was to write about a golf trip to Scotland and Ireland and to discuss problems in travel photography. This was, of course, an assignment suited to my self-interest, for what better job could I give myself than one that combines my favorite hobbies?

The trip would be twelve days in Scotland and Ireland in September, so I knew I would need good rain gear. First I called L. L. Bean to order new rain pants. (My old ones were brand newy, but my skill with a knife and fork had pushed me to a new size before I got an opportunity to wear them.) I had the other things that I would need, and over the summer I stocked up on reading material for the "down time," the airplane, the ferry from Scotland to Ireland, and the traveling to St. Andrew's, Dunbar, North Berwick, and through Ireland from Dublin all the way beyond Shannon to Lahinch and Ballybunion.

The primary question was, what photo gear should I take? When I travel I always attempt to bring back a few distinctive shots, but I also try to use equipment that I have never used before -- to satisfy my curiosity or to familiarize myself with the photo equipment for our marketing effort. Hopefully I could bring back a few shots for this newsletter that would not be embarrassing and, I admit, I would have an opportunity to spend almost two weeks playing with my toys. (A digression: I have lately been teasing my wife for arranging and re-arranging our living room furniture for the umpteenth time since we married. "You are a grown woman," I say. "It's like you are playing house, or playing with dolls and a make-believe tea set." Of course, I don't have a leg to stand on. Nothing could have been more childish than I was, in my den at home, surrounded with two full camera outfits plus an array of accessories, packing and unpacking, trying to get everything "just right." My wife was too polite to ask whether I was enjoying playing with my photographic "toy soldiers and electric train set.")

Of course I first chose to take with me my favorite standby, the Leica outfit that accompanies me on virtually every trip I take: a chrome Leica M6, chrome 35/f2 Summicron, made in Germany back in the 1960s, an old style Wetzlar black 50/f2 Summicron -- the one without an infinity lock that was made for the Leica M4 and Leica M5--and a current 90/f2.8 Elmarit-M, all packed neatly in a Fogg Bee Bag.

Normally I use a later model 35mm Summicron, but I had tried this one on a trip to Germany last year and liked the results (although truthfully I am sure the current model is a better lens). I use the earlier 50/2 Summicron because it is superb and is smoother focusing, in my opinion, than any other 50mm Leica lens, and the 90/f2.8 Elmarit-M has been my favorite because it is better than my 90mm Tele-Elmarit and I like the built-in lens hood. There is nothing new I can say about the Leica M6: it is the finest 35mm camera made today.

My other outfit was a Contax ST and four lenses, the 18/f4 Distagon, a 35-70mm Vario- Sonnar f3.4, a 85/f2.8 Sonnar, and a 200mm Tele-Tessar f4. I like the Contax ST because it is reliable and easy to use. The ABC automatic bracketing system is marvelous, and I like the Contax ST's "feel" and the quiet way it does its job. I do wish it were a little lighter and I would happily give up the built-in motor drive and batteries, but for me it is the best designed 35mm SLR on the market -- plus the best dollar-for-dollar value. I never considered an autofocus SLR because I hate them. I am hopelessly old-fashioned, a snob, and too impatient to learn the new autofocus technology. No matter how many times I try to understand the instructions for a Nikon F4S or N90, for instance, I become confused and irritated by "techno-babble" that seems to me to be far removed from the job at hand: taking photos.

My lens selection was quirky. I took the 18/4 Distagon because I kept on thinking there would be a use for it in crowded interiors or for cityscape shots, but I must admit I only used it once during a visit to an Irish castle and the results were lousy. This was not, to be sure, the fault of the lens, only the fault of the photographer. It is the kind of lens that makes a system complete, but the 18mm focal length on a 35mm format requires care and imagination that I simply do not have.

I brought along the 200mm Tele-Tessar f4 because I have owned it for two years and, I am ashamed to say, have never used it. I rarely use anything longer than 90mm, and I wanted to try out this light-weight, nicely balanced Zeiss T* objective. The 35-70mm Vario-Sonnar f3.4 is a standby for me and served as my workhorse for much of the trip. It did all I could ask.

The lens, however, that was extraordinary, was the 85mm Sonnar f2.8, a small palm size portrait lens that is slow by modern standards but a lens that produced contrast, sharpness, and a clarity beyond almost anything I have seen in a SLR short telephoto. Yes, I know that Leica 90mm Summicrons and 90mm Elmarits are wonderful. Haven't I been touting them for years? Well, I maintain that, while I am convinced nothing can beat my Leica "portrait" lenses, both in the SLR and rangefinder systems, this compact 85mm Sonnar f2.8, a lens that unfortunately is no longer in the Contax line, is really a doozy!

You know how it is. As I spread my gear on the table in my den, my travel outfit started to grow like Al Capp's "Schmoos" of Li'l Abner fame. One piece of gear mystically started to re- produce itself into another and then another item of travel gear.

In addition to the Leica M6 and Contax ST outfits, I included a black Contax T2 loaded with 200 ASA color negative film for snapshots, my trusty pair of Leica 8x20 BC binoculars, two specialty filters, a B+W "Star" prism and a #1 soft focus, and then a long list of gadgets and gizmos that almost all get used in the course of a twelve-day trip, camera case "stuff" that serves to demonstrate my eccentricities: a fountain pen and a roller ball (one for notes and letters and the other for marking film), a Swiss army knife, lens brush, Sharp 8200 Organizer, which functions as my 512K "electronic Filofax," business card case (because "You never know..."), extra ink for my fountain pen, Ghurka Pocket Secretary, Mini Maglite intense beam flashlight -- perfect for middle of the night hotel room searches for pants, sweater, book, or note pad, not to mention the odd late night excursion -- a palm-size electronic calculator, allergy pills, small electronic flash, extra four pack each of AAA and AA batteries, sunglasses, airline tickets, passport, travelers' checks, and foreign currency.

And, to prove to you what a "nut case" I really am, I also packed another electronic gizmo that I have found almost indispensable, a little 512K Voice Organizer. The older I get the more forgetful, and compulsive, I become, so my organizer is ideal for remembering appointments, dates, meetings, things to do, telephone and room numbers, and ideas. I can speak into the small mouthpiece and later retrieve all this at my command, and there's an alarm/reminder capability and additional space for holding one hundred telephone numbers.

Most of the weight I would be toting was from the cameras and lenses, so I made a final decision not to take my mainstay, the Leica M6 outfit. I really wanted to try the Zeiss lenses, and by the time I had everything carefully stowed away in its pocket or pouch of my Billingham 335, the case I finally decided to use, I just did not want the extra weight of the Leica gear.

 

Here are a few half tongue-in-cheek pointers on travel photography from my trip:

1. If the weather is lousy, your photos might be lousy -- but something is better than nothing (especially if you're on an expensive trip).

I know enough about travel photography to know that the best images always seem to be taken early in the morning or late in the afternoon. There is something about the angled light at these times that has a pleasing modeled effect, plus you can capture those deep yellows and burnished orange tints that add drama to virtually any subject. My goal is to arrange my day for early and late shooting, but like most of us, my record for honoring resolutions is spotty -- at best.

On this trip the weather simply did not cooperate, even if I had had enough pertinacity to honor my resolutions. Scotland was beautiful -- if you like wind and rain, and as I lugged my Contax ST around, usually mounted with the 35-70mm Vario-Sonnar f3.4, which I always like to plug, and looking for opportunities for the kind of travel work I like, I only got wetter and wetter. True I played some golf, hoping to bring back photos of classic Scottish links style courses (seaside courses laid out through almost treeless, gorse covered sand dunes and rolling hillocks), and we did travel through picturesque East Lothian towns, but the continual gloomy weather was my enemy. It did not impede my golf, for we only walked off a course once -- when it started to hail as we began to play the famous #1 Course at North Berwick. But by the time we left for Ireland, I only had one image that was a keeper, the obligatory shot of the 18th fairway of St. Andrew's Old Course and the club house of the majestic Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St. Andrew's and the neighboring Rusak's Hotel.

For golfers this shot is a must. I knew that I was only re- taking a cliche, but I felt that I had to bring back from a photo excursion to Scotland this familiar shot. Of course the day was grey. It had been raining on and off, and I had my Contax ST around my neck as I pulled my golf bag on what the Scotch call a "trolley." After I walked off the tee on the final hole at golf's Mecca, I fired away, making sure I included the winding Swilken Burn, the charming brook that runs through the first and eighteenth fairways, in the foreground, and the famous buildings on the horizon.

Yes, a sunny day would have been better, but I was wet and weary, tired of hauling my bag and my camera, dismayed by the blind shots and unseen hazards of the most famous golf course in the world. But, I too had done what so many had done before me: I had photographed this classic St. Andrew's scene and, of course, three- putted the final green for a bogey.


 

2. If you can't find an interesting subject, settle for an interesting color combination.

By the time I boarded the ferry to travel from Cairnryan on Scotland's west coast to Larne, Ireland I had pushed half a dozen rolls of Kodak's Lumiere 100 through my Contax ST, but I knew that there was nothing I had taken that would be good enough for this newsletter. My shutter release finger was getting itchy, so I walked around the waiting area planning to take some shots of the huge ferry that was boarding cars. Perhaps the ferry was secretly a military vessel, for an official ran over and directed me in clear terms that no photography of the ferry was allowed.

With my frustration increasing, I was determined to use my Contax ST and the trusty 35-70mm Vario-Sonnar on the first sunny day in a week, so I shot the fuel drums. The colors were stunning, even though the image was admittedly static.

A few days later I had a similar experience in Limerick. I strolled through much of the downtown of this down-at-the-heels Irish town that had the familiar urban landscape one sees in almost every country -- a combination of vacant stores and boarded up windows just a few blocks from recently gentrified storefronts and pedestrian malls. My eye caught the facade of three imaginatively painted

storefronts. I waited a minute or so in the hope that an interesting pedestrian would come into view, and my patience was rewarded by the appearance of a jaunty young mother pushing stroller who formed a nice juxtaposition with the colorful facade. Her sunglasses were a fortuitous touch that set off the incongruity of the bright facades.


 

 

 

 

 

 

3. It is never too late to become independent: forget castles (they're boring).

Almost every time I go to Europe I end up being dragged to look at another castle. While I don't claim that every castle looks like another, I do think that Americans are unduly fascinated by castles, whether they're in London, Versailles, or Heidelberg. It is probably because castles are so un-American, so foreign to us, that bringing home a photo of a castle broadcasts to our friends and relatives proves that we really have been away.

On this trip I decided to strike a blow for my own independence from having to prove to myself or to anyone else that I really was on a trip to a faraway land. I declined to visit Edinburgh castle, choosing instead to stroll through downtown to get the "feel" of the city, and I resisted a guided tour of Malahide Castle, in suburban Dublin. It was far better ambling through the stately gardens of Malahide Castle, taking people photos and playing with my Contax lenses, then viewing another tapestry, another aristocratic gilded bedroom set, or another overdone 16th century painting of unruly centaurs carrying off virgins in flowing while gowns.


4. Use the right lens for the job
(not the right toy).

I took along my Zeiss 200mm Tele-Tessar f4 because I was determined to try it out, and the results were good news and bad news. Unaccustomed as I am to any telephoto lens other that a Leica 90mm telephoto, I was unprepared for how carefully I had to focus the 200mm Tele-Tessar in order to get acceptable results.

One of the few sunny days we had was when we went exploring Dublin. After a splendid Irish stew at a downtown bar, along with two pints of Harp's lager, I strolled through the city to check out the camera stores for used Leica gear and to try out the 200mm Tele-Tessar f4 on as many subjects as possible. Frankly, the photo of the street mime performer was the only one worth printing, and even it is not as sharp as it should be. It just takes more care to use a longer lens than I am used to in my travel work. The perspective is so cramped, and the depth of field so shallow, that an old Leica rangefinder devotee like I am needs practice in focusing and composing with longer lenses.

On the other hand, I took my golfing friend's portrait because his expressive, whiskery visage is engaging. It's one of a number of shots I brought back that were much easier for me to make due to the shorter focal length. The Zeiss 85mm Sonnar f2.8 performed beautifully, and I felt perfectly at home with what I call the "head and shoulders" portrait lens. The lesson is, I think, that the long 200mm lens was, for me, a toy, while the 85mm Sonnar was a focal length with which I was familiar, a lens I could trust.


5. If your trip is to Ireland, remember the color green.

I am not crazy about landscape pictures, but I knew before I left for Scotland and Ireland that I would be in seaside locales that would offer spectacular scenery, views of wild beaches, scenic cliffs above the ocean, and grass-strewn sand dunes. I expected to take some shots of the Irish countryside too, but all in all the weather did not cooperate except for two afternoons in Dublin and Limerick. I only had one opportunity to ensure that I returned with a photo of Irish green, and that came in Shannon. Would it be cheating, I thought, to bring home a photo showing lush Irish greenery taken at the sort of artificial setting of the Shannon Golf Club? Frankly, I liked the fact that this beautiful pond was right in the middle of the Shannon International Airport! As we played a round of golf, and as I fired away on my Contax ST, huge jets were continually taking off and landing. It was definitely not the kind of idyllic view of Ireland's countryside with which most of us are familiar.


6. Always ask permission (if you want to be polite).

I must admit that I often fail to ask permission before I photograph strangers. Here I am, a more less mature grown-up of 53, and I am still reticent about approaching total strangers. Lately, however, I have been able to be more courageous and to do the polite thing and ask. One reason is that I have learned that the results can be surprising. Here are two examples, and both turned out tolerably well.

Walking down Grafton Street through the center of Dublin I saw some wonderful yellow pears that glittered in the morning sunlight. Always interested in food in all its manifold variety -- whether in a shop window, on a menu, on my plate, or nestled in a street vendor's cart -- I politely asked permission to take a photo of the sullen vendor and her wares. She didn't say yes, but she didn't say no, so I went ahead even after she turned her head. In a way, the photo is more successful than another straight ahead shot might have been. Her shyness, the yellow of the pears and the white of the newspaper kiosk behind her, and the tattoo on her arm summed up for me her individuality.

Another example of what can happen when ask you permission is the photo of the two caddies at Lahinch Golf Club, an old course on Ireland's western coast. I asked them if they minded my photographing them as they paused for lunch. The fellow on the right asked me whether he would get paid, and when I said that he wouldn't, he tucked into his sandwich with disdain and would not look up. The other caddy, who had carried my bag that morning, was friendlier and stared right into the camera, giving me a scene of two young fellows whose reactions to me and my photography were diametrically opposed. I am glad I asked, and I am glad that one refused. It gave me a much more interesting shot.

Well, that's my primer. I make no claim for the sagacity of my advice, nor for the quality of my photography. I can say, however, it was fun to give myself the photo assignment of making a few shots I could write about here. I only wish the beauty of my golf swing had one thousandth the beauty of Scotland and Ireland -- rain and wind included! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


What's New . Products . Leica Boutique . Ordering . Rare Camera Auctions
inFocus Magazine . About Tamarkin New York . Fotolinks . Contact Us . Home

Tamarkin New York
670 Broadway #501
New York, New York 10012
blue_sphere_empty.jpg (650 bytes) p 800 289-5342 or 212 677-8665
f  212 677-8570
e info@tamarkin.com

© 1997-2000, Tamarkin New York - all rights reserved
Product availability and prices subject to change without notice.

No responsibility is assumed for typographical errors in pricing
or product descriptions.